\(\DeclarePairedDelimiterX{\Set}[2]{\{}{\}}{#1 \nonscript\;\delimsize\vert\nonscript\; #2}\) \( \DeclarePairedDelimiter{\set}{\{}{\}}\) \( \DeclarePairedDelimiter{\parens}{\left(}{\right)}\) \(\DeclarePairedDelimiterX{\innerproduct}[1]{\langle}{\rangle}{#1}\) \(\newcommand{\ip}[1]{\innerproduct{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\bmat}[1]{\left[\hspace{2.0pt}\begin{matrix}#1\end{matrix}\hspace{2.0pt}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\barray}[1]{\left[\hspace{2.0pt}\begin{matrix}#1\end{matrix}\hspace{2.0pt}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mat}[1]{\begin{matrix}#1\end{matrix}}\) \(\newcommand{\pmat}[1]{\begin{pmatrix}#1\end{pmatrix}}\) \(\newcommand{\mathword}[1]{\mathop{\textup{#1}}}\)
Needs:
Signed Set Decomposition
Needed by:
None.
Links:
Sheet PDF
Graph PDF

Signed Set Decomposition Existence

Why

Does a signed-set decomposition exist for any signed measure?

Result

The answer is yes.

Suppose $(X, \mathcal{A} )$ is a measurable space and $\mu : \mathcal{A} \to \eri$ is a signed measure. There exists a signed-set decomposition of $X$ under $\mu $.

Copyright © 2023 The Bourbaki Authors — All rights reserved — Version 13a6779cc About Show the old page view