For general measure theory, we need an algebra of sets closed under countable unions; we define such an object.1
A countably summable subset algebra is a subset algebra for which (1) the base set is distinguished (2) the complement of a distinguished set is distinguished (3) the union of a sequence of distinguished sets is distinguished.
The name is justified, as each countably summable subset algebra is a subset algebra, because the union of $A_1, \dots , A_n$ coincides with the union of $A_1, \cdots, A_n, A_n, A_n \cdots$.
We call the set of distinguished sets a sigma algebra (or sigma field) on the base set. This language is justified (as for a regular subset algebra) by the closure properties of the sigma algebra under the usual set operations. We sometimes write are $\sigma $-algebra and $\sigma $-field.
A sub-$\sigma $-algebra (sub-sigma-algebra) is a subset of a sigma algebra which is itself a sigma algebra.
We often denote a sigma algebra by $\mathcal{A} $ or $\mathcal{F} $; the former is a mnemonic for “algebra” and the second is a mnemonic for “field”. The calligraphic typeface is meant as a reminder that the object so denoted is a set of sets.
A common pattern is also to use the calligraphic font of whichever letter is being used for the base set. Thus, if $A$ is a set, then we might choose to denote a sigma algebra on $A$ by $\mathcal{A} $.
Often, instead of saying “let $(A, \mathcal{A} )$ be a countably summable subset algebra” we say instead “let $\mathcal{A} $ be a sigma algebra on $A$.” Since the largest element of the sigma algebra is the base set, we can also say (without ambiguity): “let $\mathcal{A} $ be a sigma algebra.” The base set is $\cup \mathcal{A} $.
\[ \Set*{ B \subset A }{ \card{B} \leq \aleph_0 \lor \card{C_{A}(B)} \leq \aleph_0 }. \]
$\mathcal{A} $ is an algebra; the countable/co-countable algebra.2