We want to make conclusions.
A conclusion is a statement that holds necessarily as a consequence of other statements. We have a list of quantified logical statements, and we call them premisses. We want to state which other statements hold necessarily if the premisses hold. A sequence of statements, each of which follows from the previous, ending with a conclusion is called a proof of the conclusion. The process is deduction. A deduction is a statement which follows necessarily from other premisses.
A proposition is another term for a statement. An unproven statement (or premiss) is also called a principle. We will often set apart propositions and principles from the text. We bold them and label them with Arabic numerals (see Letters) to enable us to reference them.
Since principles have no proofs, they will look
like
Since propositions have proofs, but are used like principles, they will appear stated first, and followed by their proof.
We outline a few of the methods of proof used in this text.
If we have as premisses that a statement $P$ implies a statement $Q$, and we have $P$, then we have $Q$. It is common that this reasoning is done in chains. $P$ implies $Q$, and $Q$ implies $R$. So if we have $P$ then we have $Q$ and if we have $Q$ then we have $R$. So in other words, we can also deduce that $P$ implies $R$.
A contradiction occurs when we can deduce a statement and its opposite from the same premisses. If we can deduce a contradiction when we append to a list of premisses a given premiss we can conclude that the given premiss is false.
To make propositions and principles easy to state, we will often introduce new terms. Doing so is a process of definition. These definitions are abbreviations for more complicated to explain objects or properties of objects. In other words, all definitions are nominal, which means that they just name things which are already known to exist. They are made to give us language and to save space. When we are defining a term, we will put it in italics.